COVID-19 INJECTION IS NOT A VACCINE: FDA BETRAYED GOLD STANDARD SCIENCE AND AMERICAN TRUST

COVID-19 INJECTION IS NOT A VACCINE: FDA BETRAYED GOLD STANDARD SCIENCE AND AMERICAN TRUST

Because of President Trump’s Restoring Gold Standard Science Executive Order (binding within 30 days), I am convinced that he will adhere to the scientific and legal definition of a vaccine – as defined by the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID, NCI, U.S Patent Office, and Ninth Circuit Court – A VACCINE MUST PREVENT THE DISEASE AND PREVENT ITS TRANSMISSION – the mRNA gene therapy INJECTION DOES NEITHER – a salient fact arbitrarily and capriciously ignored by FDA’s Drs Prasad and Makary thus defying President Trump’s Executive Order, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, agencies and Institutes, and thereby putting 100-200 million Americans at risk.

Regardless of age, the COVID shots will not help anyone with other risk factors because it will not prevent them from getting COVID nor will it prevent them from transmitting COVID.  

The harm from these shots is real and the shots cannot be justified given the low fatality rate of COVID. This gene therapy must have different guidance and thresholds for market approval.

Since COVID-19 injections are not vaccines, the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts, allowing compelled vaccination, is irrelevant.

Instead, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, which protects the right to refuse medical treatment, would apply. The federal government lacks a basis to mandate COVID-19 injections for employment or service, and the mandated childhood COVID-19 injections for school violates the right to refuse medical treatment recognized in Cruzan.

BIG PHARMA PARTNERING WITH TELEHEALTH — HELPING PATIENTS or ENCOURAGING BAD PRESCRIBING ?

BIG PHARMA PARTNERING WITH TELEHEALTH — HELPING PATIENTS or ENCOURAGING BAD PRESCRIBING ?

Current rules from the FDA apply to drug companies’ ads, requiring them to show risks. But telehealth companies aren’t held to the same standards — even when they promote the same drugs. That could mislead patients.
Are doctors favoring drugs from partner companies?
Are patients being properly evaluated?
What exactly are the companies paying each other for?
Is the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) being violated?

GROK

GROK

Mr Elon Musk – Your X men arbitrarily and capriciously suspended my account (@DrSimone joined Feb 2009, 5218 posts) even though your own Grok says they have it wrong and I did not violate any X rules. Two days after I sent Grok’s comprehensive analysis to your X men, they completely blocked me from using Grok. Please reinstate.
“Based on this [Grok’s] analysis, the content does not appear to violate X’s rules as they are generally understood. It’s a critical opinion piece with references, not a clear breach like hate speech or a scam. X tends to allow robust debate, especially on topics like health policy, unless it crosses into specific prohibitions” – Grok
https://tinyurl.com/2tep4mae